| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - In D2, the shrinkage of the yarn B was too low and sample C was a comparative example which the skilled person would not modify.XI. After the closure of the debate and the deliberation by the board, the representative of appellant 01 requested to reopen the debate and to be given the opportunity to object to the term normalizing in claim 12 of the main request which had no clear meaning.
|
