| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - Florentino Garc??a-Mart??nez, however, has argued that the author of the scroll considered it to be not a new Torah but a revealed exegetical work, intended to serve as the normative, definitive, interpretation of the true intentions of the Law of Moses. 26 Lawrence Schiffman, continuing this line of thought, believes that the scroll was a kind of halakhic midrash, providing the biblical foundatio
|
