| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - Although ignored or refuted by real scientists, the Report became a centerpiece of climate anti-science for years, treated as totally authoritative by some newspapers and many books, such as Essex [21] and McKitrick [14] (2008, 2nd Edition), Rapp (2008), Solomon [22] (2008), Hayden [23] (2008), Horner [24] (2008), Alexander [25] (2009), Booker [26] (2009), Lawson [27] (2009), Michaels [28] and Bal
|
