| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - So the I am not going FF yet because there is no FF equivalent to the 17-55mm f/2.8 IS argument is a fallacy, since on FF, f/4 + better ISO performance is comparable to 1.6x f/2.8, and both lenses have IS. Now, if someone is waiting for f/2.8 IS on FF because the whole point of moving to FF is to achieve better performance, rather than comparable performance (from a technical standpoint), I can not
|
