| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - Quite apart from the fact that most 'opponents' of the past subjunctive nevertheless - albeit grudgingly - admit the existence of a present subjunctive (hardly, in itself, a particularly consistent point of view), a form that all but the most extreme among them* accept as a true past subjunctive and which is formally distinct from its indicative counterpart - i.e. conditional 'were' with first and
|
