| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - We held further that. once Doyle had shownthat his conduct was constitutionally protected, and that this conduct was a "substantial factor . . . in the Board's decision not to rehire him,the school board was obliged to showby a preponderance of the evidence that it would have reached the same decision as to respondent's reemployment even in the absence of the protected conduct.Id. at 287.With res
|
