| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - Reply ??? fvckoffallah on September 2, 2013 at 6:51 pm Looks like the neo cons have no other choice than to defend Flanagan???s reprehensible behavior, and defend the premise that merely looking at child porn is a victimless crime, when time and again the SCoC have ruled that merely viewing child porn is part and parcel of the same package, reprehensible behavior defended to mitigate partisan poli
|
