| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - Ripoll certainly had some pretty old books, this being exactly the context of Zimmermann???s discussion, and that one of them could have been a theological and chronographical volume dating to 636 is far from impossible, though its loss is a bit of a blow if so.6 In that case, the Prince Quintil?? was no mere prince as the English use would have it; he was the king, no less.
|
