| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - Uoberweg (Vol II. 50) notices the difference between the two forma of the argument in the following remark: The Cartesian form of the ontological proof has a defect from which the Anselmic is free; namely, that the premise, 'being is a perfection,' involves a very questionable conception of 'being' as a predicate among other predicates, while Anselm has indicated a definite kind of being, namely,
|
