| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - Can it be said that the bait-master is a person ??? actually employed in the catching, curing or making of fish or oil,??? if even the Legislature thought so why did they add to these words ??? or such person as shall have supplied bait to, &c.??? And if the bait-master would not be entitled to this preferential claim, were it not for the express language used in reference to him, how can his serv
|
