| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - I agree and in one sense I would go still further, to say there has even been a kind of intent to obscure it, yet that ???intent??? does not belong to the IPCC per se or indeed to particular scientists, but to the narrative itself (which is certaintly *not* sentient nor even agential, yet by virtue of evolved states across populations and years has algorithmic social influence, which manifests via
|
