| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - Darrow then argued (as summarized by Larson) that ???the antievolution statute was illegal because it established a particular religious viewpoint in the public schools.??? Darrow???s claim that favoring Christianity and the Bible over other religions or other sacred texts violated non-establishment or free exercise was well ahead of the legal precedent of the era, as summarized by the prosecutor:
|
