| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - There the Court held that even though there was a violation of the literal terms of the National Prohibition Act, the conviction could not be upheld in the light of admitted entrapment, saying [t]o construe statutes so as to avoid absurd or glaringly unjust results, foreign to the legislative purpose, is, as we have seen, a traditional and appropriate function of the courts.
|