| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - did not connect the defendant to the crime, because it would require the Court to speculate regarding the ownership of the vehicle, and the identities of the driver and the passenger.[67] In State v. Thorson, 264 N.W. 2d 441(ND 1978), the North Dakota Supreme Court held that in situations where it is unclear as to whether or not the person testifying against the defendant is an accomplice, the Cou
|
