| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - I'd> say Stephen Wolfram's design is about as good as you can get - and> certainly better than Lisp!Well, I guess I disagree with respect to (a) the programming language,which is, around the edges, is a hodge-podge of peculiar syntax and semantics, easily and frequently demonstrated.and also (b) the mathematical/data/numerical expression language, which requires [], and makes up its own incompatib
|
