| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - Is not ???expert??? testimony rather liberally allowed in courts these days and could not sufficient experts be found to make an ???educated??? guess at what the ???general??? damage has been to CA from AGW or more specifically in this case, carbon dioxide and other GHGs, and as a consensus, without ???hard??? direct evidence, pass muster with the right judge(s)?
|
