| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - On appeal, National argues that the district court erred in that there were controverted material issues of fact, as to the pilot's experience; that finding an ambiguity in the policy did not make summary judgment proper or negate the existence of fact questions; and that the terms, such as hours, had only one meaning in the aviation industry a meaning under which Owens did not qualify.
|
