| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - Hon's principal argument on appeal is that Judge Sweet erred when he charged the jury that they could find likelihood of confusion, an element of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2320, either among the members of the purchasing public or among the members of the nonpurchasing public ... [including] persons who have no intention of purchasing a watch, such as the recipient of a gift or someone who simply views th
|
