| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - In the New Statesman, Alasdair MacIntyre stated that although Words and Things was a splendid piece of philosophical polemic which nobody interested in the subject ought to ignore, it is too terse and schematic to be convincing; it was also a pity that Gellner did not extend his sociological analysis to the ulterior motives of Russell and his other allies (1959: 597???598).
|
