| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - Essentially, Plaintiff argues that, (a) because Chemonics explicitly states that, in certain instances where an employee is terminated for misconduct, etc., it is not liable for salary or other related costs that are incurred after the date of termination, then (b) Chemonics has also clearly agreed to be liable for the salary of all of its employees-regardless of whether or not they actually per
|
