PropertyValue
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type
http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value
  • IV. Oral proceedings took place on 14 July 2008 before the Board of Appeal.Appellant I (opponent) requested that the decision under appeal be set aside and that the patent be revoked.He mainly argued as follows:The appeal filed by the opponent is admissible as the present representative had an authorisation to represent the opponent Coronet-Werke when the appeal was filed.
http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasQuotedFrom
  • epo.org