| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - The Court of Appeals affirmed, concluding that FPA 27 - which saves from supersedure state laws . . . relating to the control, appropriation, use, or distribution of water used in irrigation or for municipal or other uses, or any vested right acquired therein - as construed in First Iowa, did not preserve the State's right to regulate minimum flow rates, and that the FPA pre-empted WRCB's minimu
|