| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - The Court of Appeals affirmed, concluding that FPA ?? 27??which saves from supersedure state laws . . . relating to the control, appropriation, use, or distribution of water used in irrigation or for municipal or other uses, or any vested right acquired therein as construed in First Iowa, did not preserve the State's right to regulate minimum flow rates, and that the FPA pre-empted WRCB's minimu
|
