| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - The result is a belief that while it was ok for them to argue it is not ok for us to argue with them.ReplyDeleteDFNovember 23, 2011 at 4:47 PMThe ban on Steinzaltz was exclusively because of its content--i.e. an academic approach to the Talmud's realia, its cavalier attitude to its personalities, and a critical misunderstanding of the nature of the transmission of the Oral Law.That is sheer fant
|
