| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - The tension in Alfano's criticism arises from the fact that if a type-fact (a psycho-physical fact about a person) does figure in the explanation of belief and action, then something must be fixed about it, i.e., whatever it is that makes it the type that it is. (Types can not be types, after all, unless there is something that always makes it the case that some token is an instance of its kind.
|
