| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - The Cahill court's casual dismissal of blogs as merely rhetorical hyperbole,38 rather than statements of fact that can be proven false, ignores the case-by-case factual inquiry traditionally applied in a defamation case.39 The court's characterization of blogs also ignores the inescapable reality that blogs are an emerging form of legitimate and widespread communication of both fact and opinion,
|
