| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - The conclusion of the courts below that Lake Nixon is not a private club is plainly correct ....' (10 Cal.4th at p. 619, quoting Daniel v. Paul, supra, 395 U.S. at pp. 301-302 [89 S.Ct. at p. 1699].) The defendant in Daniel v. Paul was an entity that was operated for profit, but we noted in Warfield that a number of other cases decided by the United States Supreme Court demonstrate that the sam
|
