| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - Therefore, a motion in limine or other attempt to exclude the evidence would not have been successful.(b) Bagwell contends that trial counsel was deficient in allowing State's witness, neurosurgeon Rusyniak, who treated the victim, to testify as to his opinion of Bagwell's own medical condition after having suffered an aneurysm because the testimony was improperly based on facts not in evidence.
|
