| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - According to Michael, the ruling ranged from strange to absurd and was an attempt to alter the facts to suit the outcome.Indeed Sohlberg's ruling was later cancelled by a higher instance, and the newspaper was forced to print an apology.Sohlberg's appointment should be seen within the context of recent sustained pressure on the Judicial Selection Committee, the body responsible for appointment
|
