| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - The second, however, is a belated assertion that a richer sense of constitutional interpretation ??? what Jack Balkin calls Living Originalism ??? shows that the Wickard decision was consistent with the original meaning of the Constitution after all, even though there is not so much as a glimmer of support for that position in any of the decided cases from Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) on forward.
|
