| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - For example, the opinions involving pornography tend to avoid judgmental comments about the quality or content of the images (e.g., they refrain from disparaging descriptions such as "snapshots") and the judges do not seem to be belittling plaintiffs by saying that they should not be bothering them with "small claims (that should not be heard in federal court) or characterizing them as money grabbe
|