| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - If I understand correctly (and I may not), you approximately defend the idea that the change of marriage to admit same-sex couples is an essential and unprecedented divergence from the ecclesiastical definition, but then assent to a perfect example of where another divergence is already extant (i.e., the church would not (or, for the sake of argument, would not) marry Charles and Camilla, but th
|
