| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - Examining the last objection first, Connecticut claims that the conformity hearing procedures, 45 C.F.R. Sec. 213, were unfair because the hearing officer lacked the power to subpoena witnesses, papers and other evidence, 45 C.F.R. Sec. 213.22(b), and because there is no provision for discovery by deposition or interrogatories.
|
