| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - Hopper and Thompson presented multiple facets of transitivity expressed by the world???s languages, such as action vs. non-action, telic vs. atelic, and high vs. low potential for agency, where the first in each of the oppositions correlates with high transitivity.[3] Malessa???s results often correlate with Hopper and Thompson???s model, and Malessa refers to the latter a few times.
|
