| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - Everything else the Court discussed after this finding is obiter, including the paragraphs relied on by the respondent.78 The Supreme Court distinguished Auton from Eldridge v. British Columbia (Attorney General), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 624, which was concerned with unequal access to a benefit that the law conferred and with applying a benefit-granting law in a non-discriminatory fashion: Auton at para
|
