| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - ng as he is qualified to do so and there is a proper foundation for the opinion); and (d) did at no time articulate any objection to Dr. Compaine's testimony beyond the lack of prior notification.12 Assuming, arguendo, that Dr. Compaine should not have been allowed to testify as an expert, the defendants have not demonstrated any consequent prejudice.
|
