| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - f instructions could support that conclusion in the jury case, or the details of a generically limited charging document would do in any sort of case??? (emphasis added; citation omitted)); id., at 24 (plurality opinion) (???Developments in the law since Taylor . . . provide a further reason to adhere to the demanding requirement that . . . a prior conviction ???necessarily??? involved (and a prio
|
