| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - The Kansas Supreme Court considered petitioner's undertaking with the FPC (as well as the reference to a similar undertaking in an indemnity agreement proposed by another oil company to its lessors) to be evidence of an industry usage (or common understanding, U.C.C. ?? 1-205, Comment 4, 1 U.L.A. 86) that in a case such as the present one interest would be paid at the FPC-prescribed rates.
|
