| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - d that is not wholly good.4) Therefore, Havok is not actually talking about God.There is the argument, and I have given it two or three times before in simpler forms.If you give no reason to think that love is a part of God's nature, and not cruelty, then your own attribution of said properties seems rather arbitraryCruelty is not good.
|
