| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - it is a standard for most history students of the period: a very entertainingly written, fluid account, although very one sided (as the title suggests, Hyde was a royalist) and perhaps deserves to be called 'Tragedy' rather than 'History', as it is pretty much justifying Charles' gallant, but doomed, plight - which is probably not quite how it was in reality.
|
