| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - ation).So, yes, it is because not only are not there five votes going forward for a robust (and correct) reading of Section 5; but there also weren't five votes in a recent, binding holding of the Court. (By contrast, cases such as Griffin and Jones do support the reliance on section 2 of the Thirteenth Amendment, even though it is well-nigh inconceivable that the current Court would decide those ca
|
