| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - Maybe there just seems to be.But then we can appeal to the sort of principle often used the theists in defence of taking religious experience at face value (incl Plantinga and Swinburne): that it is reasonable to take appearances at face value, unless there is some special reason to consider appearance deceptive.At which point, the onus falls on the theist - i.e. you - to explain why appearances are
|
