| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - The Court does not settle the ambiguity in the word ???discriminates??? in subsection (b)(4)???leaving open both the appropriate comparison class and the type of differential treatment required to constitute discrimination.[Footnote 3] The majority ???hold[s] only that ??11501(b)(4) enables a railroad to challenge an excise or other non-property tax as discriminatory on the basis of the tax scheme
|
