| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - With regard to typicality, the Court concluded that plaintiffs were subjected to unique defenses relating to standing that cut to the core of their case, including factual disputes as to (1) whether the subject printer cartridges were purchased by corporate entities associated with plaintiffs, depriving plaintiffs of ???consumer??? status under the CLRA and (2) whether the named plaintiffs could e
|