| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - The gist of this argument is that when we consider the claim that a certain mental event, M, is a cause of another event, R, we see that M??s physical supervenience base, P, has all the credentials to serve as a cause of R, thus threatening to preempt M??s claim to be a cause of R. The only way out for the nonreductivist would seem to be to recognize both M and P each as a full cause of R, making
|
