| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - The case already is a year old, SCO has gone from saying it does not need resolution of the District Court Litigation to proceed to saying it is indispensable, and from proposing a plan with SNCP that collapsed in early April to saying in the Second Extension Motion and again in this Third Extension Motion that it has been working (diligently, SCO claims) with SNCP since sometime in March -- that
|
