| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - There just is no such thing as such intentionality as theoretically metacognized ??? no matter how pragmatically deflated. ???Erroneous??? ??? or for that matter, ???deceived??? ??? refers to instances where the other is synched to something other than the world, if anything at all. ???Epistemic vigilance??? doesn???t require there be any intrinsically normative function (believed-in or actual) so
|
