| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - First, the modal interpretations of Lewis (1970) and Adams (1971) do not square very well with the rest of the Proslogion: the claim that being than which no greater can be conceived should be read as being than which no greater is possible would have us render the claim of Proslogion 15 to be that God is a being greater than any which is possible.
|
