PropertyValue
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type
http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value
  • Having used both the 18-135 and 18-200, I can say the 18-135 is definitely a better lens (less distortion, better IQ), but, you do lose that extra reach...but since you already have the 100-400 he is not really an issue.I would agree with everyone else that the 15-85 is the best bet considering what you already have, but, if not, the 18-135 would be the 2nd best.
http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasQuotedFrom
  • canonrumors.com