| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - Moreover, concerning the combination of both aspects, i.e. the futility and the interest to act, the respondent has argued that the present invention was indeed futile, but has stressed convincingly that, in any case, an opponent could nevertheless have an interest to oppose for avoiding possible future infringement suits on the basis of a granted patent covering a large field.Therefore, since t
|
